What is a polymath, and what does polymathy really mean? Is polymathy good or bad? Who are the real polymaths?
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
the non-polymath as barbarian?
To know only one thing well is to have a barbaric mind: civilization implies the graceful relation of all varieties of experience to a central humane system of thought. The present age is peculiarly barbaric: introduce, say, a Hebrew scholar to an ichthyologist or an authority on Danish place names and the pair of them would have no single topic in common but the weather or the war (if there happened to be a war in progress, which is usual in this barbaric age).
Robert Graves, The White Goddess, Chapter 13
Monday, January 9, 2017
The economist as polymath
You may remember that I posted a week or ago a kind of crazy quote from the Greek writer Lucian, who wrote that even that a pantomime must be polymathic, which, to Lucian, meant that a pantomime needed to have knowledge of culture; music, rhythm, and meter; natural and moral philosophy; rhetoric; painting and sculpting; and ancient myths and history.
Well, that wasn't just an old way of thinking. It turns out that some great thinkers thought that way even into the twentieth century.
The famous economist John Maynard Keynes wrote that the "master-economist must possess a rare combination of gifts. He must be mathematician, historian, statesman, philosopher—in some degree. He must understand symbols and speak in words. He must contemplate the particular in terms of the general and touch abstract and concrete in the same flight of thought. He must study the present in the light of the past for the purposes of the future. No part of man’s nature or his institutions must lie entirely outside his regard."
The master economist must thus be a polymath!
Well, that wasn't just an old way of thinking. It turns out that some great thinkers thought that way even into the twentieth century.
The famous economist John Maynard Keynes wrote that the "master-economist must possess a rare combination of gifts. He must be mathematician, historian, statesman, philosopher—in some degree. He must understand symbols and speak in words. He must contemplate the particular in terms of the general and touch abstract and concrete in the same flight of thought. He must study the present in the light of the past for the purposes of the future. No part of man’s nature or his institutions must lie entirely outside his regard."
The master economist must thus be a polymath!
Friday, January 6, 2017
Why polymathy? Because polymaths make connections that others don't.
The 18th century author of the first modern encyclopedia,
Ephraim Chambers, thought that polymathy itself “sought the connections between
subjects,” writing, “Where numbers of things are thrown precariously together,
we sometimes discover relations among them, which we should never have thought
of looking for.”
That is the essence of
the value of polymathy. The polymath can make these connections and discover
the relationships between completely different ideas and concepts not by
reading about them, but because they are thrown precariously together in his or
her mind.
Thursday, January 5, 2017
Rutherford Aris, pt. 4
We have talked about Rutherford Aris's chemical engineering and paleography careers, but Aris was more than just a chemical engineer and a
paleographer. He put the arts and sciences together and was truly an interdisciplinary
thinker. He believed that engineers were aided by thinking interdisciplinarily,
as he did. He started a series of seminars in the Minnesota engineering
department that addressed the arts and the sciences.
He wrote a number of essays on the interaction of the arts
and the sciences and on the interplay between his specialties of mathematical
modeling and paleography (and on the interplay between mathematical modeling
and poetry!). But his interests ranged far more widely than even his widely
disparate specialties.
He had a poem on literary criticism published in the journal
New Literary History. He co-wrote an
article in a technology journal on Anglo-Saxon military theory. He even wrote
an essay in the form of a conversation between a mathematician, an engineer,
and a paleographer (his three interests) on the importance of approaching
mathematical modeling from multiple points of view.
And h was also famous for a prank that he pulled on Who’s Who in 1974. His biography was
already in Who’s Who, but, in the
early 1970’s, Who’s Who began sending
him a biographical data sheet to fill out in the name of Aris Rutherford. He
wrote back, telling them that there was no such person, but his protests did
not register. Who’s Who continued to
request a bio from Aris Rutherford, and finally Aris sent one.
Aris Rutherford made it into the 1974-75 edition of Who’s Who. Aris Rutherford was a
Scottish prodigy and a serious tippler. He obtained his degree at the age of 18
from the Strath Spey and Glenlivet Institute of Distillation Engineering, and subsequently
had such positions as the chief design engineer and tester for the Strath Spey
Distillation Company and visiting professor of distillation practice at the
Technological Institute of the Aegean. He wrote three books, including American Football: A Guide for Interested
Scots. Unfortunately (or fortunately), the hoax was shortly exposed, and
Aris Rutherford lasted only one year in Who's
Who.
For his renown in fields as far removed as chemical engineering and paleography, Rutherford Aris makes our list. He was a proselytizing polymath who was devoted
to the connection between the arts and the sciences, scattering classical
references throughout his engineering papers.
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
Rutherford Aris, pt. 3
While Aris was a noted chemical engineer, remember that it
was one of his side projects, paleography, that developed into full blown
expertise and elevated him to polymath status.
He developed his interest in ancient scripts, the shapes of
letters, and calligraphy when he was on sabbatical at Cambridge University in
1964. At Cambridge, he attended the paleography lectures of one of the leaders
in the field, Cambridge professor T.A.M. Bishop, and was bitten with the letter
bug.
He ultimately became a leading scholar in the field, and was
appointed a professor in the University of Minnesota’s Department of Near
Eastern and Classical Studies, where he became most well known for his two books on ancient scripts, an index to a book
on first millennium Latin scripts (An
Index of Scripts in E.A. Lowe's 'Codices Latini Antiquores,' Pts. I-XI and
Supplement) and a history of Latin scripts from the first through the
fifteenth centuries (Explicatio Formarum
Litterarum (The Unfolding of Letterforms from the First Century to the
Fifteenth)).
Tuesday, January 3, 2017
Rutherford Aris, pt. 2
Rutherford Aris remained at the University of Minnesota until his death
in 2005, and became a giant in the field of chemical engineering. He wrote
thirteen books and over three hundred articles in the field, mentored dozens of
graduate students, and held visiting professorships at a number of other
universities, including the University of Cambridge and the Institute for
Advanced Studies at Princeton.
See here for a comprehensive bibliography of Aris’s work.
Aris was a leader in the mathematical modeling of chemical
processes. He studied why chemical reactions might spin out of control and how
engineers could better control them. But his work was not just theoretical; it
greatly helped the chemical industry improve its safety and efficiency. His
research and scholarship contributed to the University of Minnesota being considered
the leading chemical engineering graduate program in the United States.
Monday, January 2, 2017
Rutherford Aris, the chemical engineering polymath
Let’s get back to talking about the real polymaths. Here’s
an extremely unusual polymath: Rutherford Aris, a British-American chemical
engineer who also was one of the world’s most renowned experts in paleography,
the study of handwriting.
Aris was an intellectual prodigy, completing the
requirements for a mathematics degree with the highest honors, with a physics
minor, from the University of London at the age of sixteen. However, he never
actually attended college; he did all of his studies by correspondence. But he
was refused his degree at that time because he was felt to be too young. So he
took a job as a laboratory assistant with a chemical company until the
university saw fit to award him his degree in 1948, when he was nineteen. He
spent the next ten years alternating between post-graduate work, teaching
mathematics, and working for the chemical company.
In 1958, the University of
Minnesota, where he had done some post-graduate research, hired him as a
chemical engineering professor, even though he had no Ph.D. He remedied that
deficiency by once again taking a correspondence class at the University of London,
this time for a doctorate in mathematics and chemical engineering. He wrote his
thesis, “The Optimal Design of Chemical Reactors” (which was later translated
into Japanese, Russian, and Czech, if not other languages) in six weeks, and
obtained his degree in 1960.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)